Tag Archive: film


Mind blowing

Every so often, there comes along something that blows your mind.  I wouldn’t say it’s a once in a lifetime experience, as something always comes along an challenges that perspective.  For me, the things that blow my mind include: books, films, and amazing scenery etc.  There are few films that have blown my mind, Hero and The Matrix are two films that challenged my thoughts on films.  The first because the cinematography was utterly stunning (even more so now we’ve got it on Blu-ray), the second because it challenged my mind, much like an M C Escher drawing, paradoxical I guess you could say.

Of course there are films in our burgeoning collection that awe me, I love them, they’re fantastic entertainment, Casino Royale, The Day After Tomorrow to name a couple.  I love those films for different reasons, although I’ll admit that Casino Royale went on a tad too long.  There are also films that have been highly rated that I just thought the hype was just that, hype and hot air.  Titanic and Avatar are two such films that come to mind.  I can even say that an acquaintance was dismayed to find that I’ve never seen Titanic, nor do I have any desire to.

Today however, I was blown away by Inception.  I had slight misgivings over the film, simply because its star is Leonardo DiCaprio, who to be frank, I can’t stand and I don’t think is a great actor (I know there are those who would beg to differ, I’m just one lone voice), still I knew it had Michael Caine, Marion Cottilard and Tom Hardy in it so there was some saving grace in there.  The film however, isn’t simply about the actors, nor the special effects or the story, it’s all three together that make it something breathtaking to behold.

Unlike The Matrix which could be pulled to pieces the minute they released the two sequels, this film is well thought out, and you can see that Christopher Nolan has looked at similar films and tried to learn from the ludicrousness of them.  The story is well thought out, with no little detail overlooked.  Even where the architect is taught about paradox structures, has a reason to it.  You’re spoon fed little pieces of detail that build up like the structures they’re creating in the dreams.  It’s very much like pulling apart each layer of an onion (without the eye watering consequences).

Oddly enough, watching the film, I’m reminded of that legendary line uttered by Morpheus in The Matrix, ‘Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real?’.  Of course there are many similarities that can be drawn between the two films, although I’d have to say Inception was probably more believable as something that could actually take place (only slightly mind you).  I know for certain that there are many occasions when I’ve wished my life was a dream, and that I could wake up and it would somehow be somewhat better than it actually is.

I think it’s now written in stone that the Wachowski brothers have had their day.  With two spectacular Batman films under his belt, and now Inception, I would suggest that Christopher Nolan is now a force to be reckoned with.  It would be interesting to see what he would do with a Bond film, he’s already said that a lot of Inception was done in homage to the Bond franchise, and that’s none more evident than with the snow fortress part of the dream (think Timothy Dalton in The Living Daylights or The Spy Who Loved me).  Every detail has been well thought out and carefully crafted, and of course that’s what the film is all about, little details that plant themselves in the sub concious psyche.  Well I think he’s certainly done that, and spectacularly at that.

If you really do only see one film this summer, make it Inception.

Death becomes us all

Wow.  It’s not right, to be 32 to and to see people who you grew up watching die when they’re only a few years older than you are.  Of course I’m talking about Corey Haim, who died yesterday.  Why on earth am I bothering to write anything about him when he stopped being so famous a long time ago, and an admission of liking him is probably slightly embarrassing?  I guess he is indirectly responsible for my love of books, well certainly my love of Dean Koontz books anyway.

Let me explain.  I grew up a loner, I spent a lot of time on my own, so I spent a LOT of time watching films.  I got addicted to films with Corey Haim in (look,  I was a teenager, it’s probably the same thing with teenagers and vampire films today).  So anyway, I ended up watching a very obscure film with him in called Watchers.  One thing led to another and a traipse through WH Smiths one Saturday led me to “bumping into” Dean Koontz books.  The rest as they say, is probably history.  I started reading Watchers and then read just about everything else that I could get my hands on by Dean Koontz, then by other similar authors (except Stephen King, don’t like his books for some reason).

If I’m being a bit nostalgic, (which clearly I am as I’m listening to Pearl Jam, REM and Stone Temple Pilots), then it’s worth recalling that I ended up reading a lot of books that films were based on.  Mainly for the reason that we had no cinema in the town where I grew up, and no video rental stores, you either bought it, or relied on Sky.  So I read things like, Silence of the Lambs (great book, well written, the film is very close to the story), What’s Eating Gilbert Grape (the book was OK I seem to remember, but it’s the only film I’ve seen with Leonardo DiCaprio in, he’s a terrible actor), Pride and Prejudice (OK, so I loved the TV series, we did have TV, it wasn’t that archane in Somerset growing up), and Sleeping with the Enemy (great book, great film).

Anyway, it’s just quite sad that he’s died really, he clearly didn’t have a fantastic life, probably a typical sad story of the wasted youth of a child star.  I guess hats off to him for giving me my love of reading the genre I like to read.  I hope he has a better afterlife.

Terrible acting

So I finally got around to watching Twilight and then went to see New Moon.  Talk about teen angst overload.  I liked the story, or the idea behind the story.  It was a great kinda vampire idea that sat behind it.  Although it was a little bit Twin Peaks with a Buffy overtone.  It all seemed a little too serious for an teenage film.  A girl falling head over heels in love with a hundred year old vampire who doesn’t look a day over 21 (pft 17 my arse).

The films were filled chockablock full of bad acting.  It was like an ITV period drama, lots of (really bad) music over tones with wafting scenes that didn’t have any good dialogue in them.  It all seems a little preposterous.  It’s a shame really but these things happen I guess.  Not much that can be done to argue with the situation.

I’m currently watching The Golden Compass.  Another film that you really hope will be so much more than it actually delivers.  Absolutely amazing cinematography and the Steam Punk overtones are truly brilliant.  The thing that lets it down is the sodding main lead… Dakota Blue Richards cannot act for toffee and is probably the reason why we won’t get to see the Amber Spy Glass or the Subtle knife on the big screen.  It’s utterly saddening because all the adult actors and actresses play the parts superbly.  Nicole Kidman is very good as the evil Mrs Coulter.

I guess it ties in quite nicely, as the three films were directed by the same person.  There’s a huge difference between the films, one very polished and as pained as I am to admit it, well written, the other, nice scenery and a lot of teen angst.  I can see the difference in the writing styles of the authors as well.  Neil Pullman is a literary genius with a completely gifted writing style.  When I’m a successful author (yeah I know, but positive mental attitude and all that), I would love to be as good as Neil Pullman.  Stephanie Meyer on the other hand, is not the queen of dialogue and really could learn a thing or to from her English counterparts (read J K Rowling and Neil Pullman), both of them had more than enough original content to sustain them over seven and three books respectively.  I think I can summarise the New Moon Saga quite easily… girl falls in love with a vampire, she can’t be with him ’cause she’s not one, there’s also a pack of Werewolves, one of which is in love with her, never the twain shall meet… and then you swing between the two sides.

John Hughes

Well the news came with a dull thud to the senses. Listening to the radio on the way into work this morning, fighting with a headache and naff weather. John Hughes has died. The man who brought us films like The Breakfast Club, Ferris Bueller’s Day off and my fav, Weird Science. Wow.

I don’t think there’s a Hughes film I haven’t seen, even the really bad ones. Although he wasn’t really an active “player” in hollywood any more, there is a sense of loss with him having gone from the world. Such a shame.

State of play

So I managed to bag a free ticket to go and watch a preview of State of Play today.  I knew the film was coming out but I was a little reserved by the thought of watching it as I’m not the biggest Russell Crowe fan, that said I did enjoy the TV series.  Anyway, a free film is a free film and it’s not often they have tickets available for round here.

So what did I think?  Could Russell Crowe replace John Simm as the reporter?  I went in with an open mind, and hoped I would enjoy the film.  I wasn’t actually disappointed, which is a good thing I guess.  Gritty, sarcastic and a few funny moments.  It was well cast, especially with Helen Mirren as the chief at the newspaper, Cam.

Anyway, I love something with a good twist in it, book, film or TV, this had more twists than a helter skelter.  Very enjoyable, definately worth a watch.  Especially if you liked Enemy of the State.

The big bang or SETI?

If you’re bored, and fancy looking at some amazing science, then might I recommend you pop along to www.google.com/sky It might just blow your mind.

This week has been all things science.  I’ve watched the two part documentary on Stephen Hawking, a National Geographic documentary on Huble (amusing as it was filmed years ago and the assumptions it made about what was going to happen in the future were ever so slightly askew) and now I’m in the middle of watching Contact. 

The debate about being able to go into space is an interesting one.  Whilst I’m a science geek at heart (even if I was lousy at it when I was at school, doesn’t help me being in awe of modern scientific achievements) and I’m not in the slightest way religious (lets not get started on that one), I don’t fancy going into space.  I’m happy to sit here on earth, and let others have fun. 

My mind is torn between exploring distant galaxies for other life, or the quest to understand how our galaxy was born.  Perhaps with better understanding of where we came from we might be able to understand what life is out there, and how we can communicate with it.  I still can’t get my mind around space being infinite, I mean surely, it’s got to stop somewhere? If it’s infinite, and galaxies are expanding how can they expand any further if space doesn’t stop? I know it’s the cliché from the teaching advert, but it’s quite true in asking, what the hell can we expand into?

Of course I’m all for SETI, I’m just a bit hesitant, not for the spiritual reasons that would bug so many, but because, well, you’ve seen what Hollywood has made of Sci-Fi… I’m sure not everything out there is good, there being so much hatred and suffering on our own planet, what makes us assume it’s going to be any better out there?

Two Books, Two Films

I seem to have a thing going on with the number two (not that number two you sick creatures), I mean a tale of two comedians and now two books, two films.

Last week my rental copy of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix arrived.  As this was the film version of the biggest Potter book, I was expecting, well, more… I have to say I was deflated and let down.  There were so many good things in the book that were simply missing from the film.  Somethings I could understand, but the Hospital scene, totally gone! why? You got to see Neville’s parents, and it would have been pretty good to see the Hospital.  Instead you got “look everyone, Dad’s back from hospital”… err, where was the gag with him trying to get stitches? Pah.  I felt there was far too much missing from the book that it seemed watered down and without direction.  I want to say more, but well there’s not much point.

And the other book? The Northern Lights, for I will call it that as it’s the British title of the book, ok so the film is called The Golden Compass, but I know it as the Northern Lights.  I saw the film today, I’ve read the book twice.  Hmmm… and indeed Hmmm… I have doubts over the casting of some of the characters, don’t get me wrong, there were some excellent actors and actresses in it, but I think it lacked conviction on places.  Ten out of Ten for the casting of Serafina Pekala, Farder Coram, Lee Skoresby, Ma Costa and Lord Faa, but the rest? hmmm. 

Dakota Blue Richards hasn’t convinced me she is Lyra, merely that she’s probably a stroppy little madam.  She seemed to struggle (as I did when reading), with the colloquialisms laid out in the book, words like “en’t” they just seemed to stick, and hang, just as much as if she’d said “fuck” at the most inopportune place.  As for Ian McKellan, he has an imposing voice, and as Gandalf it was as if he was born to play that role.  As Iorek Byrnson, he was not.  My first thought was Patrick Stewart, they’re voices are quite similar.

I was interested to hear that Daniel Craig was playing Lord Asriel and
Nicole Kidman was playing Mrs Coulter.  Daniel Craig had the worst line
in the film “Can’t we sort this out like gentlemen” (I actually
cringed) and Mrs Coulter just wasn’t as venomous as I’d hoped.  Both
excellent actors let down by a poor script.  Daniel Craig was especially let down, when you read the book, and try to imagine Lord Asriel Daniel Craig works as someone to portray him, but for some reason he just didn’t work.
 

I knew what was coming when I saw it for the first time on the screen, and then I thought, “oh god, please don’t let them do that every time Lyra reads the Aletheometer”… Sadly as there is no god, my prayers were not answered.  The worst special effect of the film was played over and over every time the Aletheometer was consulted.  The dust came swirling out of the centre of the Aletheometer and you got to see what it was telling Lyra, only it was not constructed well and you couldn’t clearly see what she was seeing.  I think had they had a stronger actress, she could have explained away what it was saying, even if it was just to Pantalaemon.

Other special effects were better than hoped.  For example the air-ships, using gyroscopes to power them was quite impressive.  The Daemons, as a rule were quite convincing, with the exception of Mrs Coulter’s golden monkey, which just didn’t look right.  There was some sloppy work in there though, the scene with Lyra riding on Iorek’s back across a frozen lake, did not flow very well, it looked, lumpy.  When Mrs Coulter bent down to pick up her Daemon on the airship, it was clumsy, badly edited.  I know a lot of money was spent on the effects, and they took a long time, but I felt they could have been done better in places.

Empire said that the ending had been cut, to act as a follow onto the next film, but it still came as a bit of a slap when you got to the end.  I was all fired up for the ending.  What they have done is imply that two of the main characters (for those of you who have not read or seen the film yet, I won’t spoil it in detail), will carry on throughout the next film, which in the book they do not, a whole new set of characters are introduced.  Why would you do that?  I don’t believe the director’s argument for doing so is a valid one. 

Again this was another film that felt watered down, whilst the outline of the plot was in essence true to the book, it just didn’t feel as rich and full bodied as the book did.  Perhaps they will polish it up further between the film and the DVD release, to give it that Lord of the Rings shine.  It has to be said, even the special effects in the Harry Potter film were significantly better.  It was good to see the film, to see it brought to life and alive, I enjoyed it, but not as much as I had hoped I would.

Update 6/12/07:
<a href=”http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7128985.stm”>Two “religious” reviews of the Golden Compass</a>, so following on from yesterday’s rather long post (above), today I read the linked reviews on BBC news online.  The first one was a pathetic attempt at a review, focusing solely on the Magesterium as a Catholic style institution.  Get over it, go harp on about how great the Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe is.  It’s no reason to boycott what is in essence being marketed as a Christmas Kids film.  The kids aren’t going to see the Religious divides in this, in less their parents indoctrinate them so much that they are forced to believe that is what the film is about.  Yes I get the irony, and the sarcasm, but it’s not a film about Polar Bears.

The second review from the atheist, to a degree covered everything that I wanted to say (but probably did so poorly), he made the point I failed to, but also felt, the film was too short, it should be 2.5 hours long.  I don’t like the idea, (and I think Philip Pullman agrees) that the film is being used to wage some religious war against Catholicism and Atheism.  Whilst Pullman has recognised that the book is anti-religion, I think there is something beyond that in the book.  The books are wonderful stories, the kind that open your mind and pull you through.  As for them not being Children’s books? I think that’s incorrect, as you’ll find them in the 8 to 12 reading range in Waterstones… (I have copies, I was looking for Christmas presents).

Whilst I think the first review is a farce, I think the second one is pretty much spot on in terms of having to pull their finger out for the second and third books.  Perhaps they should get Peter Jackson on the case, he seemed to have pulled off something completely amazing with the Lord of the Rings trillogy, I’m sure he didn’t spend as much as Wietz did on the Golden Compass and it was not a sloppy production in any way.   

It's a terrible one

This is terrible, but it made me laugh none the less…

Filming has already started on The Da Vinci Code II

It’s called I Know What You Did Last Supper.

Yes I warned you… courtesy of Holy Moly

The Interpreter

Just watched it and was on the edge of my seat all the way through. What an awesome film!! Excellent acting from both Sean Penn & Nicole Kidman. Not a big fan of Sean Penn but will admit to saying this was one of the best films I’ve ever seen him in.

Twisty and turny all the way through. With little bits given away throughout the film, but done in such a way when it all comes together you’ll be kicking yourself. All the major suspects gradually disappearing until you’re left with a climax that is so well put together you’ll wish all films could be shot like that. I’d recommend it.

I’d also add a shameless plug for screen select as they’re top notch video rentals with reliable delivery and a good selection. Although the time it can sometimes take to get your new releases is a bit disappointing.

Anyhoo… watching blade trinity now. Having watched all of Scrubs Season 1 – 3 since Christmas… I’m addicted to it and need a break from it.

woo hoo!!

People… March of the Penguins… nominated for an oscar… get thy selves watching it now!! great film… please let it win. Still it’s bound not to as the philistiens didn’t vote for Hero, they all should be taken outside and shot (said in my best Heir Flick voice).

off to tweak design of new site… greatful help from two work colleagues over the last two days might mean we’ll get somewhere to launching at some point in the next week!! w00t!

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Motion by 85ideas.