Tag Archive: in the news


Great impartiallity swindle

Please forgive me if this makes my blood boil.  The BBC have reported that Ofcom have upheld a complaint against a Channel 4 documentary called the “Great Global Warming Swindle”.  They say that it was not impartial.  Now hang on, just one, blinking minute.  Every single programme, news report or proclamation about global warming fails to be impartial.  They dictate that there is Global Warming, despite evidence to the contrary, they never give an impartial view of the situation.

I refused to believe any of it before, and I most definitely refuse to believe any of it now.  In order to get a good understanding of any situation it is important to have all the facts available.  Failure to have all the facts leads to an impartial view of a given situation.  So telling us it’s “x”, without saying anything else, is an indoctrinating view.  It’s unfair that we should have it pushed upon us.

Anyway, no doubt someone will come on here, with their own views and tell me I’m wrong.  Well that’s my privilege to be wrong in their eyes.  I think they are wrong, again this is my privilege.  If you don’t agree with me, good for you, I just hope the disagreement is of your own opinion, and not that formed of somebody else’s view that you’ve chosen to adopt as yours.

Note – I wrote this in July but for some dumb reason I didn’t publish it.

A Glimpse of Innocence

Watching the girl next door dance her way up the garden path while she was watching her shadow.  I’m sure she would have been utterly embarrassed if she’d seen me watching, so I withdrew from the window.

In other news, R is committing mass murder of the wasps that keep coming into the conservatory.

Times Top 50 Crime Authors

The Times seems to be having a run on Crime Authors this week.  They’re serialising Patricia Cornwell’s new book every day this week (of course the advert on the radio had to be played just as I got to work and not as I was passing a news agents… typical).  So I’ve had a quick read of the interview with Cornwell, which was insightful, if not a little chilling (she really is as cold as I thought she might be).  I will read the book, even though I think that Cornwell has gone down hill since her main protagonist was forced out of her job, making me think that her books had lost the passion that had made them so good to begin with.

Anyway, there is a list of the Top 50 crime authors.  I’m incredibly disappointed.  Only about four people in there who I think should be there, and a whole load of others are missing.  Where is Michael Connelly, John Connolly, Robert Crais, and Lee Child (just to name four who should be there).  Seriously, how can you have Dennis LeHanne, when he hasn’t written a decent book in years!  You put the likes of Harlan Coben (who’s latest book is as good as ever), without any of these modern writers.  Shame on you!

If you want to take a look at the list and get annoyed as much as I have, please click on the link below:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/global/article3773630.ece

As a foot note, what’s particularly interesting is that both Mark Billingham and John Connolly were invited speakers at this year’s Times Oxford Literary Festival… the key thing here being, they’re both celebrated crime authors, and it was a Times event.  Some what hypocritical I feel, but such is life.

UPDATE: Just realised that my install of MT has had a bit of a flip out and for some reason had published this entry, twice with no heading and no footnote.  I have no idea why, it’s a bit stupid really.  Anyway, I’ve deleted the two erronous entries.  So the person who’s just read the post by clicking on the link sent to them in an email… it’s nothing personal, it’s just a mess to have the same entry posted three times. 

Arthur C Clarke

Arthur C Clarke has died.  Bit of a sad one, not only one of the greatest writers of our time, but also one of the most famous people to come from Taunton.  His memory will live on at Richard Huish College (which was a grammar school when he went there), it’s now a sixth form college.  The library was named after him.

Anyway, for those of you wanting to read more there’s a good news item on BBC news http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7304004.stm

Sign of the Cross

Well the good news is that I have a designer… the bad news is that I still haven’t quite got Word Press working… I’ll keep at it.

Anyway, I thought I would get to the point of the post. So I’m on a writing course and I should be writing, and clearly I haven’t really been writing (apart from the three really short stories whilst sitting through the dullest. meeting. ever! So I thought I’d write a review of a book I finished reading last week.

Sign of the Cross, by someone who should know better.

Firstly, what kind of planet was this yank on? He starts off with an archaeology professor with the worlds worst English accent (that disappears as fast as Keanu Reeves’ in Dracula for those who care to know), who comes from that great English University, Dover. DOVER?!? seriously? I could understand that he wouldn’t go for Oxford or Cambridge never having been to either (at this time I’m not sure if he’s even been to England) for fear of getting it wrong, but DOVER? He describes it as this wonderful place, and the building so beautiful etc. Seriously. Dover. is. a. shithole.

You wouldn’t mind so much but the author then goes on to say how great his book is, and how it would have been better had he left in all the bits he wanted to etc. Woah there sport! The book is about 300 pages too long. I was drifting off through several sections because you just couldn’t get to the point. I have read some awful books in my time, but yours was simply laughable. Did you decide to jump on the Jesus approach before or after you’d read the Da Vinci code? The ending was a let down. It needed to be explosive. You needed to have something like Raymond Khoudry in the Templar Legacy. You really did promise so much and utterly failed to deliver.

The Roman thing could have been so promising. You could have blown everyone out of the water, but it just felt like a poor quality Da Vinci code ripoff. Instead of the blood of christ, you went for the blood of someone who purported to have killed christ. Was it a bit too much for you to think that Christ wasn’t what the bible says? It was not a page turner, it was a page burner. I could most definitely put it down as I read another book whilst still trying to read that one.

Challenging

Yesterday I was talking about wearing heels as being foot binding (far from flattering), the piece the item can from was following on from where Alice Walker spoke of the woman’s right to wear the Niqab. I know I’m a little late off the mark on this one, although I could still hit close to the bone given Channel 4’s alternate speech on Christmas day.

This subject does make me rather angry, but I won’t go off the deep end but will say: whilst we are tolerant of other cultures in this country, you cannot expect to use the race or religion card when what you are wearing gets in the way of the ability to do your job.

If a deaf person, who was a lip reader, could not understand you, would you continue to talk in a manner, which meant they could not understand you? If you wore a veil, and the person you were teaching had to read lips but your beliefs told you not to take your veil off, who would be in the wrong? It’s a hard thing to get your head around. I potentially put more thought into it. However I feel sometimes you have to take things at more than face value.

We should do something because it has a reasonable basis in our life, not because a peer or a book told us to. Wear long draping clothes because you may not have the most flattering of figures and it’s best to cover up (me then), wear a mask over your face because you’ve had chemo and to be infected with germs means certain death or wear flat shoes because it hurts too much to wear heels. Don’t however listen to someone who tells you to cover every part of your body possible because they’re too ashamed to see your body, without at least questioning WHY they want you to do it.

Anyway, after everything that’s been said in the news, and the mixture of emotions that it’s stirred in everyone I applaud Alice Walker for saying the following: “Women have to be extremely careful about choosing something that they consider an act of defiance that can really be used to further their enslavement”. Something everyone should consider I think.

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Motion by 85ideas.