Tag Archive: recently read


Paper book or iBook?

I know I’m jumping the gun here a little bit, but with all the rumours surrounding the potential release of the “iSlate” by Apple (name not confirmed), there is an awful lot of talk about doing away with books.  There is of course a whole digital divide when it comes to how technology can enhance your life and make it better.  Then there’s the “Apple” generation who simply adore their products (yes, that’s probably me in that category).  So what’s the big deal?  I’m a book person, and perhaps a stick in the mud when it comes to reading material, so I want to look at these things objectively.

With the advent of iTunes and the iPod, Apple did what many hadn’t, and in essence, they started the MP3 revolution.  Music at your finger tips so to speak.  No longer did you have to have shelves full of LPs that were prone to warping and getting dusty.  Neither did you have to worry about the CD, which never ended up back in the right cases.  No, instead, you’ve got your MP3 player, your computer and the ability to browse for music when you hear it, rather than waiting to find a shop that stocks it.  Many said at the time, that the MP3 revolution, and the internet would kill copyright and people would stop buying music, well the jury is still out on that one, and Zavvi did die (although possibly unrelated), so no conclusions drawn from that one yet.

I said many years ago that PDAs were a fantastic idea (somewhere around 2001 to my friend and colleague of the time BNUG).  Instead of carrying around a diary, a note book etc, you have everything in one device.  Only, you didn’t.  You still had to carry your mobile phone and you didn’t have access to your emails, it was far from perfect.  If you were (and at the time I was) a commuter on public transport, you ended up carrying around a PDA, a mobile phone, something to play music on, a book and various other bits of miscellany.  So, with the advent of the iPhone, all your prayers are answered right?  Well, not quite.  It’s a fantastic device, don’t get wrong, I love mine.  It ticks so many of the boxes that you were missing before, it has your diary, your email, your phone and an endless supply of gadgets to make your life easier.  You are however, still left without the all important book to go with it.

So 2010 is apparently the year of the tablet (although I’m sure I have a feeling of deja vu) .  Microsoft has already launched their version in partnership with a hardware vendor (who’s name I can’t remember).  Amazon have launched the new and improved Kindle (in the UK now as well), and Sony have already had their reader available for sometime.  So as an avid reader, why don’t I have one?  It’s very simple, it’s another expensive gadget that only does one thing.  In my mind, a complete waste of money.  At least with my iPhone, it gets used, a lot.  I’ll browse the internet on it from home, I’ll read blogs, I’ll twitter from it and I generally use it more than my somewhat decrepit PowerBook (to be replaced this year).

Another item to add into the mix of this failure to buy an ebook reader.  I love the feel of turning a page, of the paper between my fingers, of seeing something achieved as I motor from one end to the other.  There’s something so comforting about curling up with a really good book.  Of course it has its downsides, like book snobs sneering at you reading Harry Potter or Twilight books on the train, instead of the latest booker winning master piece.  You can also get cramp from holding something as big as The Deathly Hallows or Breaking Dawn.  It’s still a book though, I have a couple of hundred of them, I can look at the stacks of them that are dotted around the house and see an actual sense of accomplishment.  I wouldn’t get that with something digital.

Of course I can really see the upside to having a device like an e-reader.  Going on holiday would be a dream, instead of worry about how many books I could carry with me, I could load up the device and off I go.  Brilliant!  Only I like to re-read old books, so I’d have to either take old copies with me or re-buy all my books, there isn’t a way to “rip” books to put them onto the device like  you could do with music.  Then there’s the cost of these books, having had a look all of the authors I like sell their e-books at either the full hardback price, or more in some cases.  How does this work?  Surely there should be a saving involved here, you take out the printing and publishing costs and there’s more money to be made from selling them at a lower price?  Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for authors making money, really I am, I want to be an author, a successful one, but c’mon guys, cut us some slack, if you want us to take it up, give us an incentive to do so.

Which brings me back to the rumoured new Apple product.  Will it do for books what iTunes and the iPod did for music?  Will you be able to pick up the books cheaply and easily?  Will they kill Amazon and Waterstones?  Who knows.  However, the rumours are gaining pace that the “iSlate” will have the ability to browse the internet, play video content & music, and have applications.  Now if this is the case it’s a fantastic opportunity.  Given how well thought out the iPhone, iPod and larger Apple devices are, it’s going to be an killer toy that’s for sure.  I’m just not convinced that marketing it at a rumoured $1000 is going to win many hearts and minds.  I could by a MacBook for less than that.  Sure I think it’d make me a convert to eBooks, but I’m not sure the price tag will.

I’ll add as a final note, as I’m sure someone *might* pick up on the fact that there is a Kindle app for the iPhone.  I know, I’ve got it.  The problem with it is that my iPhone screen is a LOT smaller than a standard sized book.  I read very fast.  Give me a bigger screen and something I can hold, and I’m sold on it, only I’m not buying a Kindle to do it.  If you want to read more about ebooks then the lovely Tom Reynolds of Random Acts of Reality fame has started a new blog with several contributors called Paper Not Included, I encourage you to go have a read.

Neverwhere

Have decided to read Neverwhere, the totally fantastic book by Neil Gaiman, again.  I’d totally forgotten the plot, just remember it being really rather cool that it was set below the streets of London, or “London below” as it’s called in the book.  I’m really enjoying it… again!  I shall post more about it when I’ve finished reading it. :o )

That is all.

Too nice to sit inside

Well technically I was sitting inside, only it was inside of my conservatory, with the doors wide open.  It is the only place I feel safe enough to sit in a bikini.  So that is where I sat.  With the sun, and the sound of the birds, with planes scratching the sky overhead and the farmer in his tractor on the back field.  Bliss.

I also had a book, it was a bloody exceptional book.  You should go and find a copy (I’m not sure that it’s out yet).  It’s called the Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society by Mary Ann Shaffer.  Utterly genius book.

The Front

Oh dear… Went out and got The Times at lunchtime… ok so it’s still lunchtime.  I’ve read the first part of The Front, the new Patricia Cornwell book, and several things occured to me.  One, I’m begining to wonder if my view of Cornwell, is going the same way as James Patterson, which isn’t a good way to go.  Two.  I wonder if Cornwell learnt anything from the Southern Cross series of books she wrote, namely that they were utter pants.

I know that Cornwell hasn’t been doing too well of late with Scarpetta, I said that earlier, but to go out and write something, that at the outset, is reasonably poor, doesn’t help matters.  Maybe I should just stop reading her works all together.  Kathy Reichs seems to have picked up the mantle, dropped so carelessly by Cornwell.  Not to mention that Reichs is a world renowned Forensic Antrhopologist, experience that is really obvious in her books.

Oh dear, it’s a rather sad state of affairs.

Times Top 50 Crime Authors

The Times seems to be having a run on Crime Authors this week.  They’re serialising Patricia Cornwell’s new book every day this week (of course the advert on the radio had to be played just as I got to work and not as I was passing a news agents… typical).  So I’ve had a quick read of the interview with Cornwell, which was insightful, if not a little chilling (she really is as cold as I thought she might be).  I will read the book, even though I think that Cornwell has gone down hill since her main protagonist was forced out of her job, making me think that her books had lost the passion that had made them so good to begin with.

Anyway, there is a list of the Top 50 crime authors.  I’m incredibly disappointed.  Only about four people in there who I think should be there, and a whole load of others are missing.  Where is Michael Connelly, John Connolly, Robert Crais, and Lee Child (just to name four who should be there).  Seriously, how can you have Dennis LeHanne, when he hasn’t written a decent book in years!  You put the likes of Harlan Coben (who’s latest book is as good as ever), without any of these modern writers.  Shame on you!

If you want to take a look at the list and get annoyed as much as I have, please click on the link below:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/global/article3773630.ece

As a foot note, what’s particularly interesting is that both Mark Billingham and John Connolly were invited speakers at this year’s Times Oxford Literary Festival… the key thing here being, they’re both celebrated crime authors, and it was a Times event.  Some what hypocritical I feel, but such is life.

UPDATE: Just realised that my install of MT has had a bit of a flip out and for some reason had published this entry, twice with no heading and no footnote.  I have no idea why, it’s a bit stupid really.  Anyway, I’ve deleted the two erronous entries.  So the person who’s just read the post by clicking on the link sent to them in an email… it’s nothing personal, it’s just a mess to have the same entry posted three times. 

The Bell and other Nazi Technology

I love a good conspiracy theory.  Can’t help myself.  You know the normal things like was there someone on the grassy knowl? Was it really the titanic that sank? So when I picked up a book by James Rollins last year I never expected that the book would mean I wanted to end up buying books that are filled full of Nazi conspiracy theories or dare I say it, ones about Quantum Mechanics (ok so point and fact that I haven’t book the one on Quantum Evolution, as that’s what it’s really about, mainly because I procrastinated for so long it’s now out of print! curse it!!).

Anyway, I’m currently reading a book about the Bell, which is rumoured to be a device developed under the Nazi’s that has inexplicable powers (I say this because nobody knows what’s happened to it, only that it did exist).  There’s tons of conspiracy theory in there, and lots of information about the various technologies that the Nazi’s were developing.  Before I carry on, I don’t condone the Nazi’s but as I said, I love a good conspiracy theory and I love science & technology.

I can’t tell you much about the book yet, but I guess I picked it up in the hope that it might give me some ideas about writing.  I have lots of little ideas in my head but they go nowhere, so I need a theme, a pique, something that will grab my head and a whole story will come flooding out of it.  Given that I loved John Twelve Hawks books, James Rollins latest books and various other books that are pseudo-sci-fi (i.e. they’ve got a bit of science fiction in there, but not enough to make it a bona fide sci-fi book).

I have to focus, I have a goal this year and that’s to write more.  I’m not really doing well so far, mainly because the move down here has been the only thing on my mind really.  However I’m going to try really hard to start thinking about writing again.  Picking up my writers notebook and making little meme’s to myself.  I’ve already started by attacking the word of the day on dictionary.com.  So perhaps I should challenge myself on here to write something each day.  Not that I often seek responses from people, but what are your thoughts?

Two Books, Two Films

I seem to have a thing going on with the number two (not that number two you sick creatures), I mean a tale of two comedians and now two books, two films.

Last week my rental copy of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix arrived.  As this was the film version of the biggest Potter book, I was expecting, well, more… I have to say I was deflated and let down.  There were so many good things in the book that were simply missing from the film.  Somethings I could understand, but the Hospital scene, totally gone! why? You got to see Neville’s parents, and it would have been pretty good to see the Hospital.  Instead you got “look everyone, Dad’s back from hospital”… err, where was the gag with him trying to get stitches? Pah.  I felt there was far too much missing from the book that it seemed watered down and without direction.  I want to say more, but well there’s not much point.

And the other book? The Northern Lights, for I will call it that as it’s the British title of the book, ok so the film is called The Golden Compass, but I know it as the Northern Lights.  I saw the film today, I’ve read the book twice.  Hmmm… and indeed Hmmm… I have doubts over the casting of some of the characters, don’t get me wrong, there were some excellent actors and actresses in it, but I think it lacked conviction on places.  Ten out of Ten for the casting of Serafina Pekala, Farder Coram, Lee Skoresby, Ma Costa and Lord Faa, but the rest? hmmm. 

Dakota Blue Richards hasn’t convinced me she is Lyra, merely that she’s probably a stroppy little madam.  She seemed to struggle (as I did when reading), with the colloquialisms laid out in the book, words like “en’t” they just seemed to stick, and hang, just as much as if she’d said “fuck” at the most inopportune place.  As for Ian McKellan, he has an imposing voice, and as Gandalf it was as if he was born to play that role.  As Iorek Byrnson, he was not.  My first thought was Patrick Stewart, they’re voices are quite similar.

I was interested to hear that Daniel Craig was playing Lord Asriel and
Nicole Kidman was playing Mrs Coulter.  Daniel Craig had the worst line
in the film “Can’t we sort this out like gentlemen” (I actually
cringed) and Mrs Coulter just wasn’t as venomous as I’d hoped.  Both
excellent actors let down by a poor script.  Daniel Craig was especially let down, when you read the book, and try to imagine Lord Asriel Daniel Craig works as someone to portray him, but for some reason he just didn’t work.
 

I knew what was coming when I saw it for the first time on the screen, and then I thought, “oh god, please don’t let them do that every time Lyra reads the Aletheometer”… Sadly as there is no god, my prayers were not answered.  The worst special effect of the film was played over and over every time the Aletheometer was consulted.  The dust came swirling out of the centre of the Aletheometer and you got to see what it was telling Lyra, only it was not constructed well and you couldn’t clearly see what she was seeing.  I think had they had a stronger actress, she could have explained away what it was saying, even if it was just to Pantalaemon.

Other special effects were better than hoped.  For example the air-ships, using gyroscopes to power them was quite impressive.  The Daemons, as a rule were quite convincing, with the exception of Mrs Coulter’s golden monkey, which just didn’t look right.  There was some sloppy work in there though, the scene with Lyra riding on Iorek’s back across a frozen lake, did not flow very well, it looked, lumpy.  When Mrs Coulter bent down to pick up her Daemon on the airship, it was clumsy, badly edited.  I know a lot of money was spent on the effects, and they took a long time, but I felt they could have been done better in places.

Empire said that the ending had been cut, to act as a follow onto the next film, but it still came as a bit of a slap when you got to the end.  I was all fired up for the ending.  What they have done is imply that two of the main characters (for those of you who have not read or seen the film yet, I won’t spoil it in detail), will carry on throughout the next film, which in the book they do not, a whole new set of characters are introduced.  Why would you do that?  I don’t believe the director’s argument for doing so is a valid one. 

Again this was another film that felt watered down, whilst the outline of the plot was in essence true to the book, it just didn’t feel as rich and full bodied as the book did.  Perhaps they will polish it up further between the film and the DVD release, to give it that Lord of the Rings shine.  It has to be said, even the special effects in the Harry Potter film were significantly better.  It was good to see the film, to see it brought to life and alive, I enjoyed it, but not as much as I had hoped I would.

Update 6/12/07:
<a href=”http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7128985.stm”>Two “religious” reviews of the Golden Compass</a>, so following on from yesterday’s rather long post (above), today I read the linked reviews on BBC news online.  The first one was a pathetic attempt at a review, focusing solely on the Magesterium as a Catholic style institution.  Get over it, go harp on about how great the Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe is.  It’s no reason to boycott what is in essence being marketed as a Christmas Kids film.  The kids aren’t going to see the Religious divides in this, in less their parents indoctrinate them so much that they are forced to believe that is what the film is about.  Yes I get the irony, and the sarcasm, but it’s not a film about Polar Bears.

The second review from the atheist, to a degree covered everything that I wanted to say (but probably did so poorly), he made the point I failed to, but also felt, the film was too short, it should be 2.5 hours long.  I don’t like the idea, (and I think Philip Pullman agrees) that the film is being used to wage some religious war against Catholicism and Atheism.  Whilst Pullman has recognised that the book is anti-religion, I think there is something beyond that in the book.  The books are wonderful stories, the kind that open your mind and pull you through.  As for them not being Children’s books? I think that’s incorrect, as you’ll find them in the 8 to 12 reading range in Waterstones… (I have copies, I was looking for Christmas presents).

Whilst I think the first review is a farce, I think the second one is pretty much spot on in terms of having to pull their finger out for the second and third books.  Perhaps they should get Peter Jackson on the case, he seemed to have pulled off something completely amazing with the Lord of the Rings trillogy, I’m sure he didn’t spend as much as Wietz did on the Golden Compass and it was not a sloppy production in any way.   

Sign of the Cross

Well the good news is that I have a designer… the bad news is that I still haven’t quite got Word Press working… I’ll keep at it.

Anyway, I thought I would get to the point of the post. So I’m on a writing course and I should be writing, and clearly I haven’t really been writing (apart from the three really short stories whilst sitting through the dullest. meeting. ever! So I thought I’d write a review of a book I finished reading last week.

Sign of the Cross, by someone who should know better.

Firstly, what kind of planet was this yank on? He starts off with an archaeology professor with the worlds worst English accent (that disappears as fast as Keanu Reeves’ in Dracula for those who care to know), who comes from that great English University, Dover. DOVER?!? seriously? I could understand that he wouldn’t go for Oxford or Cambridge never having been to either (at this time I’m not sure if he’s even been to England) for fear of getting it wrong, but DOVER? He describes it as this wonderful place, and the building so beautiful etc. Seriously. Dover. is. a. shithole.

You wouldn’t mind so much but the author then goes on to say how great his book is, and how it would have been better had he left in all the bits he wanted to etc. Woah there sport! The book is about 300 pages too long. I was drifting off through several sections because you just couldn’t get to the point. I have read some awful books in my time, but yours was simply laughable. Did you decide to jump on the Jesus approach before or after you’d read the Da Vinci code? The ending was a let down. It needed to be explosive. You needed to have something like Raymond Khoudry in the Templar Legacy. You really did promise so much and utterly failed to deliver.

The Roman thing could have been so promising. You could have blown everyone out of the water, but it just felt like a poor quality Da Vinci code ripoff. Instead of the blood of christ, you went for the blood of someone who purported to have killed christ. Was it a bit too much for you to think that Christ wasn’t what the bible says? It was not a page turner, it was a page burner. I could most definitely put it down as I read another book whilst still trying to read that one.

The Traveller

I can see what’s going to happen here. It’s going to be another Da Vinci Code. Firstly can I say I read the Da Vinci Code in first edition hardback. I thought it was a great book, but it wasn’t until it came out in paperback that people started saying what a cult book it was. Now I think it’s kinda passe and detracts from a very good book, I don’t believe in the bible so I thought it was great, but as far as I’m concerned it really is just like the bible, a great work of fiction. NB any religious nuts taking offence to this, don’t bother posting some crap in my comments section, piss off now. I don’t care what you think, it’s my right to have this opinion, go create your own blog and talk about how much of a hethan I am there.

Ok back to the traveller. I finished reading it this week, I bought it before I saw lots of reviews about it, or the underground station plastered with adverts for it. I thought it looked interesting. Finally picked it up and well I couldn’t put it down. I don’t know why. I love the idea, I loved the theory behind it, but damn it, it really wasn’t *that* good. The prose was great, right up until the main protagonist left the UK to go to America, after that it got watery, the detail was gone the raw grittiness and the description just lost it’s basis.

You’ll sit there and wonder all the way through what makes each side so special, is one wrong or is it right? Who really are the bad guys in all of this? As far as I can tell there are only one set of people with special powers, the travellers themselves. What do the Tabular do that makes them so frightening? In essence, what is the big deal?

As I said, I really did enjoy the book, and it’s haunted me since I put it down, a search of Waterstones didn’t yeald anything like it. It’ll have the same grip as the Matrix did on screen, only I hope that it doesn’t have the same affect that the Matrix did, i.e. after the first film, it was so over hyped they got worse rather than better.

I read in the Observer this morning that the author is a mystery, his publishers have not met him, he’s to become a legindary recluse. Does this mean we now have someone other than Belle Du Jour to while away our time wondering about? OK I’m taking it a bit far, but you get my meaning. Perhaps the author’s reclusiveness will detract from his writing, making people rave about a book that’s pretty good at best, possibly to become over rated at worst.

Such is life. I’ve got some new books to read now… I’ll probably read in the next week:
Karin Slaughter – Faithless
Dean Koontz – Velocity
Jack Kerley – The Death Collectors.

I may also get bored at some point today and sort out the leaning tower of books into author order…

Trace by Patricia Cornwell

I finished reading it this morning. Can I just ask, what has happened to Patricia Cornwell? Does she just not enjoy writing the Scarpetta books any more? Has she run out of credible ideas? I mean the last book was a shock. Sitting there reading that Benton wasn’t in fact dead… did she plan this or was she short on stories?

This book was good, it looked good from the outset, more of a return to her old style, but it was sloppy, it wasn’t put together well, the narative was all over the place and well lets not get into revenge issues that she keeps dragging up. It was good to see Marino taking care of himself, that Benton was well and still in contact, but the overall plot, was weak, and the ending was poor. Does the word closure not appear in her notes anymore… If I were her editor I’d send it back and demand the ending have more bulk to it… I know I’m not and maybe my new job has given me a critical eye but even so… not her best but still better than the last one.

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Motion by 85ideas.